Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Additional Readings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Additional Readings. Show all posts

Friday, March 11, 2011

Want to know how the economy is doing? Just check out what your Girlfriend is wearing :)


Lipstick as economic indicator
After the terrorist attacks of 2001 deflated the economy, companies were selling more lipstick than usual. Lipstick purchases are a way to gauge the economy. When it's shaky, sales increase as women boost their mood with inexpensive lipstick purchases instead of $500 slingbacks. According to figures from Kline & Company, a market-research firm, lipstick sales across the board fell 5.8 percent during 2008, while liquid foundation sales have grown 2.5 percent. The logic behind the Lipstick Index makes sense. When the economy is a worry, and unemployment is high, people downgrade their purchases, from expensive brands to cheaper ones, or luxury products to generic. Small indulgences substitute for bigger items we can't afford, and we engage in purchasing behaviors that boost our morale: we get a new haircut, go to a movie that takes our mind off our tanking 401(k)s, maybe mix up a tall (and heavy) cocktail to make us forget there's a recession at all. But on its own, the Lipstick Index is superficial, trivial—and frankly, just not believable. Sure, persuading women to look their best as the world crashes around them might have worked 70 years ago, when, during World War II, cosmetics company Tangee touted lipstick as a way for women to "put on a brave face" and cosmetics sales increased 25 percent.

The Hemline Index

The hemline index stands for professor Taylor’s observation that hemlines on women’s dresses rise along with stock prices. Or in other words – as the economy gets better women get shorter and shorter skirts – topping with the miniskirt. When the economy gets worse they tend to wear longer skirts.
If we look at the economy in the 20th century we see that the Hemline Index has proven itself as an economic indicator.
1920s -The twenties saw the highest stock prices in the early 19 hundreds until 1929. It was also a time of very shirt skirts.
1930s – The Great Depression era meant the worst economic conditions in America during the last 100 years. It also saw very long conservative skirts that went all the way to the ground.
1940s and 1950s – The forties and fifties was a time where the people and economy were recovering from World War II. While most people had a job they had sacrificed a lot for the war. This was mirrored in the skirt lengths of the women – they typically wore skirts that were about knee hight or a bit lower.
1960s - It was the time of huge economic growth that culminated with the invention of the mini skirt in 1965.
1970s – The seventies are best known by the Oil Crisis of 1973 and the stock market crash in 1974. Fashion wise it also meant that wearing mini skirts was out.
1980s – It was a time of economic prosperity which brought shorter skirts and also power suits for women. The stock market crash known as Black Monday in 1987 also brought with it the lengthening of hemlines.
1990s – The first half of the nineties suffered greatly from the shock of the stock market crash in 1987 but during the second half of the 90s the economy started seeing extraordinary growth. It was accompanied by the retro mini skirts that quickly became fashionable.
2000s – 2008 saw the start of the biggest economic crisis seen since the Great Depression. Fashion experts agree that since longer and bohemian style skirts have started to make a comeback.
Want to know how the economy is doing? Just check out what your Girlfriend is wearing J

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Americanization of the world

https://www.msu.edu/~millettf/americanization.html
http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/transcripts/76.html
http://www.newsweek.com/2008/05/03/the-rise-of-the-rest.html
http://www.globalenvision.org/library/33/1658
http://www.suite101.com/content/a-history-of-the-world-in-six-glasses-ancient-history-a231748
http://www.suite101.com/content/a-history-of-the-world-in-six-glasses--modern-history-a255995

Monday, December 20, 2010

Sunday, November 28, 2010

The Big Mac Index

What Makes Them Jews So Powerful? From A Pakistani Writer Point of View


First and foremost this article is not your usual “news” article, rather this is an insight which I’ve got from one writer.  It circulated widely and originally titled..why are Jews so powerful?  So before you make any comments and criticism, let me forewarn you that this was written by a Pakistani Columnist, Dr. Farrukh Saleem and THIS IS HIS POINT OF VIEW.  Dr. Saleem is an Islamabad based freelance writer.  His writing says like this:
There are only 14 million Jews in the world; seven million in the Americas, five million in Asia, two million in Europe and 100,000 in Africa. For every single Jew in the world there are 100 Muslims. Yet, Jews are more than a hundred times more powerful than all the Muslims put together.
Ever wondered why?
Jesus of Nazareth was Jewish. Albert Einstein, the most influential scientist of all time and TIME magazine’s ‘Person of the Century’, was a Jew.  Sigmund Freud — id, ego, and superego — the father of psychoanalysis was a Jew. So were Karl Marx, Paul Samuelson and Milton Friedman.
Here are a few other Jews whose intellectual output has enriched the whole humanity:
- Benjamin Rubin gave humanity the vaccinating needle. – Jonas Salk developed the first polio vaccine.
- Albert Sabin developed the improved live Polio vaccine.
- Gertrude Elion gave us a leukemia fighting drug.
- Baruch Blumberg developed the vaccination for Hepatitis B.
- Paul Ehrlich discovered a treatment for syphilis (a sexually transmitted disease).
- Elie Metchnikoff won a Nobel Prize in infectious diseases.
- Bernard Katz won a Nobel Prize in neuromuscular transmission.
- Andrew Schally won a Nobel in endocrinology (disorders of the endocrine system; diabetes, hyperthyroidism) …
- Aaron Beck founded Cognitive Therapy (psychotherapy to treat mental disorders, depression and phobias).
- Gregory Pincus developed the first oral contraceptive pill.
- George Wald won a Nobel for furthering our understanding of the human eye.
- Stanley Cohen won a Nobel in embryology (study of embryos and their development) .
- Willem Kolff came up with the kidney dialysis machine.
Over the past 105 years, 14 million Jews have won 15-dozen Nobel Prizes while only three Nobel Prizes have been won by 1.4 billion Muslims (other than Peace Prizes).
Why are Jews so powerful?
- Stanley Mezor invented the first micro-processing chip. – Leo Szilard developed the first nuclear chain reactor.
- Peter Schultz, optical fibre cable;
- Charles Adler, traffic lights;
- Benno Strauss, stainless steel;
- Isador Kisee, sound movies;
- Emile Berliner, telephone microphone and
- Charles Ginsburg, videotape recorder.
Famous financiers in the business world who belong to Jewish faith include Ralph Lauren (Polo), Levis Strauss (Levi’s Jeans), Howard Schultz (Starbuck’s) , Sergey Brin (Google), Michael Dell (Dell Computers), Larry Ellison (Oracle), Donna Karan (DKNY), Irv Robbins (Baskin & Robbins) and Bill Rosenberg (Dunkin Donuts).
Richard Levin, President of Yale University, is a Jew. So are Henry Kissinger (American Secretary of State), Alan Greenspan (Federal chairman under Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush), Joseph Lieberman, Madeleine Albright (American Secretary of State), Maxim Litvinov (USSR foreign Minister), David Marshal (Singapore’s first Chief Minister), Isaac Isaacs (Governor-General of Australia), Benjamin Disraeli (British statesman and author), Yevgeny Primakov (Russian PM), Jorge Sampaio (President of Portugal), Herb Gray (Canadian Deputy PM), Pierre Mendes (French PM), Michael Howard (British Home Secretary), Bruno Kreisky (Chancellor of Austria) and Robert Rubin  (former American Secretary of Treasury).
In the media, famous Jews include Wolf Blitzer (CNN), Barbara Walters (ABC News), Eugene Meyer (Washington Post), Henry Grunwald (Editor-in-Chief Time), Katherine Graham (publisher of The Washington Post), Joseph Lelyyeld (Executive Editor, The New York Times), and Max Frankel (New York Times).
Can you name the most beneficent philanthropist in the history of the world?
The name is George Soros, a Jew, who has so far donated a colossal $4 billion most of which has gone as aid to scientists and universities around the world.
Second to George Soros is Walter Annenberg, another Jew, who has built a hundred libraries by donating an estimated $2 billion.
At the Olympics, Mark Spitz set a record of sorts by winning seven gold medals. Lenny Krayzelburg is a three- time Olympic Gold Medallist. Spitz, Krayzelburg and Boris Becker are all Jewish.
Did you know that Harrison Ford, George Burns, Tony Curtis, Charles Bronson, Sandra Bullock, Billy Crystal, Woody Allen, Paul Newman, Peter Sellers, Dustin Hoffman, Michael Douglas, Ben Kingsley, Kirk Douglas, William Shatner, Jerry Lewis, Arch Jose Manosa and Peter Falk are all Jewish?
As a matter of fact, Hollywood itself was founded by a Jew. Among directors and producers, Steven Spielberg, Mel Brooks, Oliver Stone, Aaron Spelling (‘Beverly Hills 90210′), Neil Simon (‘The Odd Couple’), Andrew Vaina (‘Rambo 1/2/3′), Michael Man (‘Starsky and Hutch’), Milos Forman (‘One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest’), Douglas Fairbanks (‘The Thief of Baghdad’) and Ivan Reitman (‘Ghostbusters’ ) are all Jewish.
To be certain, Washington is the capital that matters and in Washington the lobby that matters is The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC. Washington knows that if PM Ehud Olmert were to discover that the earth is flat, AIPAC will make the 109th Congress pass a resolution congratulating Olmert on his discovery.
William James Sidis, with an IQ of 250-300, is the brightest human who ever existed. Guess what faith did he belong to?
So, why are Jews so powerful?
Answer: Education.
Why are Muslims so powerless?
There are an estimated 1,476,233,470 Muslims on the face of the planet: one billion in Asia, 400 million in Africa, 44 million in Europe and six million in the Americas. Every fifth human being is a Muslim; for every single Hindu there are two Muslims, for every Buddhist there are two Muslims and for every Jew there are one hundred Muslims.
Ever wondered why Muslims are so powerless?
Here is why: There are 57 member-countries of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), and all of them put together have around 500 universities; one university for every three million Muslims. The United States has 5,758 universities and India has 8,407. In 2004, Shanghai Jiao Tong University compiled an ‘Academic Ranking of World Universities’ , and intriguingly, not one university from the Muslim-majority states was in the top-500.
As per data collected by the UNDP, literacy in the Christian world stands at nearly 90 per cent and 15 Christian-majority states have a literacy rate of 100 per cent.
A Muslim-majority state, as a sharp contrast, has an average literacy rate of around 40 per cent and there is no Muslim-majority state with a literacy rate of 100 per cent.
Some 98 per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Christian world had completed primary school, while less than 50 per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Muslim world did the same.
Around 40 per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Christian world attended university while no more than two per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Muslim world did the same.
Muslim-majority countries have 230 scientists per one million Muslims. The US has 4,000 scientists per million and Japan has 5,000 per million.
In the entire Arab world, the total number of full-time researchers is 35,000 and there are only 50 technicians per one million Arabs (in the Christian world there are up to 1,000 technicians per one million).
Furthermore, the Muslim world spends 0.2 per cent of its GDP on research and development, while the
Christian world spends around five per cent of its GDP.
Conclusion: The Muslim world lacks the capacity to produce knowledge.
Daily newspapers per 1,000 people and number of book titles per million are two indicators of whether knowledge is being diffused in a society.
In Pakistan, there are 23 daily newspapers per 1,000 Pakistanis while the same ratio in Singapore is 360. In the UK, the number of book titles per million stands at 2,000 while the same in Egypt is 20.
Conclusion: The Muslim world is failing to diffuse knowledge.
Exports of high technology products as a percentage of total exports are an important indicator of knowledge application. Pakistan’s exports of high technology products as a percentage of total exports stands at one per cent.
The same for Saudi Arabia is 0.3 per cent; Kuwait , Morocco , and Algeria are all at 0.3 per cent while Singapore is at 58 per cent.
Conclusion: The Muslim world is failing to apply knowledge.
Why are Muslims powerless?
Because they aren’t producing knowledge.
Why are Muslims powerless?
Because they aren’t diffusing knowledge.
Why are Muslims powerless?
Because they aren’t applying knowledge.
And, the future belongs to knowledge-based societies.
Interestingly, the combined annual GDP of 57 OIC-countries is under $2 trillion.
America, just by herself, produces goods and services worth $12 trillion; China $8 trillion,  Japan $3.8 trillion and  Germany $2.4 trillion (purchasing power parity basis).
Oil-rich Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait and Qatar collectively produce goods and services (mostly oil) worth $500 billion; Spain alone produces goods and services worth over $1 trillion,
Catholic Poland $489 billion and Buddhist Thailand $545 billion. (Muslim GDP as a percentage of world’s GDP is fast declining).
So, why are Muslims so powerless?
Answer: Lack of education!
All they do is shout to Allah the whole day and blame everyone else for their multiple failures.
There could be more reason as to why our Muslim brothers are not as lucky as our Jew siblings.  I for one knows affluent Muslim families who are far from what the freelance writer Dr. Saleem have described.  Collectively he could be write, but then again, hasty generalization is a fallacy which can be wrong.  I leave this to you readers to judge if the writer have made a good judgement on the Jews and the Muslim alike. For I believe, religion nor caste has nothing to do with what we have become, it is our choice and our vision of how our future can become.  We have a choice to do what we can and develop it to the best of our ability.
Tweet